laWow

United States Of America V. Fluent, Llc Et Al

This lawsuit, filed by the United States of America, alleges that the defendants - Fluent, LLC, RewardZone USA LLC, Deliver Technology LLC, Search Works Media, LLC, and Ease Wins, LLC - operated a deceptive "consent farm" enterprise. The defendants used misleading ads and websites to obtain personal information and consent from consumers to receive telemarketing calls. They then sold this information to telemarketers, who used it to make robocalls and calls to numbers on the National Do-Not-Call Registry. The defendants generated millions of dollars in revenue from selling consumers' information. The lawsuit seeks monetary civil penalties, a permanent injunction, and other equitable relief for the defendants' violations of various federal laws, including the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, and the CAN-SPAM Act. The lawsuit claims that the defendants' business practices were unlawful and deceptive, as they promised job interviews and free rewards that did not exist, failed to disclose the true purpose of collecting personal information, and obtained insufficient consent from consumers. The lawsuit is filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. This lawsuit involves allegations of unlawful conduct by the defendants, Fluent, RewardZone USA, Deliver Technology, Search Works Media, and Ease Wins. The defendants are accused of operating a deceptive "consent farm" enterprise, using misleading ads and websites to obtain personal information and consent from consumers for telemarketing calls. They then sold this information to telemarketers, who made robocalls and called numbers on the National Do-Not-Call Registry. The defendants profited from selling consumers' information, violating federal laws such as the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, and the CAN-SPAM Act. The lawsuit seeks civil penalties, a permanent injunction, and other relief. The defendants' business practices are alleged to be deceptive and unlawful, as they made false promises, failed to disclose the true purpose of collecting personal information, and obtained insufficient consent. The lawsuit is filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. This lawsuit involves allegations against Fluent, RewardZone USA, Deliver Technology, Search Works Media, and Ease Wins. The defendants are accused of operating a deceptive "consent farm" enterprise, using misleading ads and websites to obtain personal information and consent from consumers for telemarketing calls. They then sold this information to telemarketers, who made robocalls and called numbers on the National Do-Not-Call Registry. The defendants profited from selling consumers' information, violating federal laws such as the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, and the CAN-SPAM Act. The lawsuit seeks civil penalties, a permanent injunction, and other relief. The defendants' business practices are alleged to be deceptive and unlawful, as they made false promises, failed to disclose the true purpose of collecting personal information, and obtained insufficient consent. The lawsuit is filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. This lawsuit involves allegations against Fluent, RewardZone USA, Deliver Technology, Search Works Media, and Ease Wins. The defendants are accused of operating a deceptive "consent farm" enterprise, using misleading ads and websites to obtain personal information and consent from consumers for telemarketing calls. They then sold this information to telemarketers, who made robocalls and called numbers on the National Do-Not-Call Registry. The defendants profited from selling consumers' information, violating federal laws such as the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, and the CAN-SPAM Act. The lawsuit seeks civil penalties, a permanent injunction, and other relief. The defendants' business practices are alleged to be deceptive and unlawful, as they made false promises, failed to disclose the true purpose of collecting personal information, and obtained insufficient consent. The lawsuit is filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Full Screen
Article

United States of America v. Robert Hunter Biden

Summary: Hunter Biden is currently embroiled in a lawsuit, accused of purchasing a Colt Cobra revolver in October 2018 while allegedly using illegal substances. Despite denying drug use on the necessary paperwork, if found guilty, he could face a maximum of 25 years in prison along with substantial fines. Biden's defense team contends that the charges are politically driven, asserting that Biden's temporary possession of an unloaded firearm did not constitute a public safety risk. They intend to contest the charges, leveraging an agreement with the prosecution, recent federal court decisions, and potential Second Amendment defenses. This case could potentially ignite wider discussions about Second Amendment rights, especially as the Supreme Court is poised to deliberate on a related issue concerning gun ownership for individuals subject to domestic violence restraining orders. Opinions are divided among political and legislative figures, with some speculating that advocates of the Second Amendment might oppose the law that prohibits gun ownership for drug users.