laWow

Kavuri V. Bankman-Fried Et Al

This is a lawsuit filed by a plaintiff against FTX Trading LTD, FTX US, and several individuals, including Sam Bankman-Fried, Tom Brady, Gisele Bundchen, Stephen Curry, Golden State Warriors, Shaquille O’Neal, Udonis Haslem, David Ortiz, William Trevor Lawrence, Shohei Ohtani, Naomi Osaka, Lawrence Gene David, and Kevin O’Leary. The lawsuit alleges that the defendants offered and sold unregistered securities in the form of yield-bearing accounts (YBAs) and promoted them as safe and protected accounts that would generate returns on customers' holdings, regardless of the type of asset held. The plaintiff seeks damages, declaratory and/or injunctive relief for the losses suffered by him and other customers who purchased YBAs. The lawsuit also alleges that the FTX Entities failed due to a complete failure of corporate controls and a complete absence of trustworthy financial information. The plaintiff and other investors in YBAs are seeking damages for their losses. The lawsuit also alleges that the defendants conducted business in Florida and intentionally availed themselves of the Florida consumer market through the promotion, marketing, and sale of FTX’s YBAs in Florida, which constitutes committing a tortious act within the state of Florida. The plaintiffs seek damages exceeding $5,000,000.00, exclusive of interest and costs. The lawsuit seeks to establish a coordinated and organized structure to address the growing cryptocurrency national disaster.

Full Screen
Article

United States of America v. Robert Hunter Biden

Summary: Hunter Biden is currently embroiled in a lawsuit, accused of purchasing a Colt Cobra revolver in October 2018 while allegedly using illegal substances. Despite denying drug use on the necessary paperwork, if found guilty, he could face a maximum of 25 years in prison along with substantial fines. Biden's defense team contends that the charges are politically driven, asserting that Biden's temporary possession of an unloaded firearm did not constitute a public safety risk. They intend to contest the charges, leveraging an agreement with the prosecution, recent federal court decisions, and potential Second Amendment defenses. This case could potentially ignite wider discussions about Second Amendment rights, especially as the Supreme Court is poised to deliberate on a related issue concerning gun ownership for individuals subject to domestic violence restraining orders. Opinions are divided among political and legislative figures, with some speculating that advocates of the Second Amendment might oppose the law that prohibits gun ownership for drug users.