laWow

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump

Donald J. Trump has filed a counterclaim against E. Jean Carroll. The counterclaim argues that Carroll's defamation claims are barred by the doctrines of collateral estoppel and unclean hands. The defendant asserts that Carroll's tortious conduct and defamatory statements prevent her from recovering any damages. The defendant also reserves the right to assert additional affirmative defenses and counterclaims as appropriate. The counterclaim specifically alleges defamation by Carroll, citing her accusation of rape against the defendant in a book excerpt and her repeated public statements accusing him of rape. The defendant argues that these statements are false and were made with actual malice and ill will, intending to harm his reputation. The defendant claims that Carroll's false accusations have significantly damaged his reputation and seeks damages and a retraction of her statements. The counterclaim asserts that the court has jurisdiction over the case based on diversity of citizenship and the amount in controversy. It also argues that venue is proper because a substantial part of the events occurred in the judicial district. The counterclaim requests that the court dismiss Carroll's claims, award damages to the defendant, and grant attorney's fees and costs.

Full Screen
Article

United States of America v. Robert Hunter Biden

Summary: Hunter Biden is currently embroiled in a lawsuit, accused of purchasing a Colt Cobra revolver in October 2018 while allegedly using illegal substances. Despite denying drug use on the necessary paperwork, if found guilty, he could face a maximum of 25 years in prison along with substantial fines. Biden's defense team contends that the charges are politically driven, asserting that Biden's temporary possession of an unloaded firearm did not constitute a public safety risk. They intend to contest the charges, leveraging an agreement with the prosecution, recent federal court decisions, and potential Second Amendment defenses. This case could potentially ignite wider discussions about Second Amendment rights, especially as the Supreme Court is poised to deliberate on a related issue concerning gun ownership for individuals subject to domestic violence restraining orders. Opinions are divided among political and legislative figures, with some speculating that advocates of the Second Amendment might oppose the law that prohibits gun ownership for drug users.